Builder’s battle highlights barriers

Builder’s battle highlights barriers between provinces
The Montreal Gazette -Thursday, June-05 2003
Don Macdonald
Jocelyn Dumais has fought unsuccessfully for Ontario-Quebec worker mobility
2003-06Gazette
Jocelyn Dumais, president of the pressure group Association for the Right to Work, is fighting for an open border for construction workers between Quebec and Ontario. He calls the present situation ‘disgusting.’
The Ontario-Quebec construction fight is the highest-profile trade war in Canada. Builder Jocelyn Dumais says it’s hard to stay in business.
Fifth in a Series
MONTREAL – Don’t try to persuade Jocelyn Dumais there’s free trade among Canada’s provinces. For 11 years, Dumais has fought for an end to an Ontario-Quebec construction dispute that he says proves barriers between provinces can be just as nasty as anything dreamed up by international trading partners.

Dumais lives on the Quebec side of the border in Gatineau, but he runs a construction company in Ottawa. He says he’s tried everything to force an end to the long-festering conflict over construction-worker mobility between Quebec and Ontario that, he says, makes it all but impossible for his company to operate in his home province.

He’s taken to the courts, tirelessly lobbied politicians and even been arrested during protests against Quebec’s restrictions on construction workers and firms.

« The federal government signs free trade agreements with the United States, Mexico and Chile, but just outside Parliament we don’t have labour mobility. It’s disgusting, » said Dumais, president of a pressure group called the Association for the Right to Work.

The Ontario-Quebec construction fight may be the highest-profile internal trade war in Canada, but it’s far from the only one. Indeed, eight years after the country’s first ministers signed an interprovincial trade pact, there remain numerous barriers between provinces and critics complain governments aren’t showing the necessary commitment to make free trade work in Canada.
Interprovincial commerce often takes a back seat in the media to more glamourous international trade issues — and that’s understandable. Canadian trade with other countries has grown much faster than internal trade over the last decade and is worth more than twice as much.

But trade among provinces is nevertheless crucial for the Canadian economy, representing two million jobs and about 20 per cent of the country’s economic output.

Internal trade is especially important for growing small and mid-sized businesses that do not yet have the scale to export their products or services.
« For very large companies — the Nortels of the world — a lot of these so-called barriers are minor irritants that in the grand scheme of things don’t amount to much, » said Roman Staranczak, a senior policy analyst at Industry Canada. « But for small business … these are real barriers, not just in terms of dollar costs but also in terms of management time. »

Besides the direct impact of trade barriers on business, a perception outside Canada that the country’s internal market is balkanized among the provinces can hurt foreign investment, Staranczak said.

The Agreement on Internal Trade was signed by the provinces and Ottawa in 1994 and came into force the following year. Saved from the wreckage of the Charlottetown constitutional agreement, it was aimed at teasing out a tangle of regulations, barriers and discriminatory programs that at the time were estimated to cost Canadians about $6.5 billion annually, or about $1,000 a year for a family of four.

The pact has resulted in substantial progress in freeing internal trade across a wide range of economic sectors, said Andre Dimitrijevic, executive director of the Internal Trade Secretariat, the Winnipeg-based agency created to monitor implementation of the agreement.

For example, Dimitrijevic said bidding on provincial and municipal purchasing contracts has been opened to qualified suppliers from across the country. As well, the provinces have agreed to a code of conduct on incentives that prohibits poaching businesses from one another. And agreements allowing people to have their professional credentials recognized across the country have been developed in 42 of 51 professions, Dimitrijevic said.

He also noted that scores of interprovincial trade disputes have been settled thanks to the agreement. Of 172 disputes referred to the secretariat since 1995, only four have gone all the way to the final stage — a report by a panel of experts. The others have been addressed in one way or another, except for 10 that are still pending.
But critics of the Agreement on Internal Trade insist progress has been too slow. The provinces have proven apathetic about its implementation, missing numerous deadlines and leaving important work undone, they say.

Ottawa needs to take a stronger role in promoting internal free trade and the agreement needs to be beefed up with a stronger dispute-resolution machinery, critics contend.

« I’ve seen it up close and personal and it’s difficult for people to make complaints and get things resolved, » said Robert Knox, who oversaw the negotiation of the agreement as a federal official and was the first executive-director of the Internal Trade Secretariat.

« The issue seems to be the political commitment of some governments. They have to be committed to making it work or else it doesn’t. »

Knox, who now works as consultant for companies trying to resolve disputes, pointed to the Ontario-Quebec construction issue as an example of how governments can gum up the works.
The dispute, which dates back to the 1970s, stems from Quebec rules aimed at managing its construction labour market by strictly controlling workers and companies operating in the province. The rules have had the effect of keeping construction workers from neighbouring provinces out of Quebec’s market.

Ontario and Quebec have tried three times to resolve the dispute through bilateral negotiations and failed. Ontario, which says 5,000 Quebec construction workers stream into the Ottawa area each day under normal circumstances, lost patience and, rather than using the internal trade agreement, chose to impose retaliatory measures against Quebec construction workers and companies.

Quebec has responded with a complaint under the agreement on internal trade, but Ontario short-circuited that initiative by simply refusing to appoint a representative to sit on an internal-trade panel on the issue.

It’s been a similar story in the notorious Quebec margarine dispute. Quebec prohibits companies from colouring margarine to make it look like butter. Multinational food-processing giant Unilever is fighting the rule in the courts and Quebec has used that court battle as a pretext for refusing to name an expert to an internal-trade panel.

Even when panels have issued recommendations on disputes, provinces have been slow to act.
Peter McAuslan, owner of Montreal’s McAuslan Brewing Inc., has been both the beneficiary and the victim of Canadian internal trade barriers in recent years despite a marked improvement in beer trade in Canada since the days before 1992 when beer had to be brewed in the province where it was sold.

Trade restrictions between Quebec and New Brunswick led Moosehead Breweries Ltd. of Saint John to take a 45-per-cent stake in the smaller McAuslan operation in 2000 to get access to the Quebec market. Together the companies invested $10 million to build a 45,000-square-foot production facility in Montreal to accommodate Moosehead’s lager and McAuslan’s growth.

On the other side of the coin, McAuslan said Ontario makes it difficult for small breweries like his to set up their own distribution in the province. That means McAuslan beer ends up going through a massive Liquor Control Board of Ontario warehouse where it sometimes gets caught in bottlenecks.

« There are barriers and … you have to balance all these issues off before you proceed, » said McAuslan, who is also looking to export to British Columbia and Alberta.

McGill law professor Armand de Mestral argues the provinces have been far too slow in reducing trade restrictions and he called on Ottawa to use its constitutional powers to unilaterally strike down barriers through the courts.

« We’re all Canadians aren’t we? That’s the ultimate question, » de Mestral said. « Are we living in a Canadian market or are we living in 10 provincial markets? »
« I say the better way to go is to let the courts decide. »
The Montreal Gazette

Publicités

LABOUR MOBILITY,ADAT is back in court

LABOUR MOBILITY,ADAT is back in court
ADAT – May 25 2003

The first step in a new court battle for labour mobility will take place on Monday May 26 9.30 am at the Gatineau Provincial court.

Lawyers will meet to discuss the procedure for the new constitutional contestation of the Quebec labour law.

We hope that this time Quebec judge, will aggree with us and declare unconstitutional the Quebec labour law Chap-20.

This would end the ever lasting fight for the right to work in the Province of Quebec for Ontarian and Quebecois.

Publié dans Communiqués. Mots-clés : . Leave a Comment »

Roofer’s contested $1,000 fine 2008-02-23

OttawaCitizen

Roofer’s contested $1,000 fine raises labour-mobility questions
The Ottawa Citizen News 2008-02-23
Dave Rogers
Orléans man flagged for working on friend’s house in Gatineau

When Glenn McNamara did a roofing job for an Aylmer friend in July 2004, someone spotted the Ontario plates on his truck and informed Quebec authorities that there was an unlicensed roofer in town.

Four years later, Mr. McNamara, 52, who has been working as a roofer for 30 years, faces a $1,000 fine for operating a construction business in Quebec without a permit, even though he has never appeared in court.

Jocelyn Dumais, president of the Association pour le droit au travail, a right-to-work group, said Ontario construction workers and contractors are still being harassed and charged with breaking Quebec law despite the interprovincial agreement.

« I hoped that the political agreement on labour mobility two years ago would bring some common sense to the Quebec government, but they are still fining people, » Mr. Dumais said.

« None of the differences between the two provinces have been resolved.

« The agreement said it would make it easier for workers to obtain cards, but people are still being charged. There really is no mobility of labour because this is the only province that has such restrictive labour laws. »2008-02-23
2008-02-27_McNamara

Mr. McNamara, who lives in Orléans, said a 2006 agreement between Ontario and Quebec was supposed to resolve a decades-old dispute about labour mobility, but the deal isn’t working.

Glenn McNamara is a roofer who was charged and found guilty of violating Quebec construction law when he worked on a friend’s roof in Aylmer. Mr. McNamara said he wrote the Quebec government saying ‘it wasn’t their business to interfere in the personal affairs’ between himself and his friend.View Larger Image View Larger Image

Glenn McNamara is a roofer who was charged and found guilty of violating Quebec construction law when he worked on a friend’s roof in Aylmer. Mr. McNamara said he wrote the Quebec government saying ‘it wasn’t their business to interfere in the personal affairs’ between himself and his friend.Chris Mikula,

The agreement was intended to make it easier for Ontario and Quebec construction workers to work in each other’s provinces.

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said in 2006 that the dispute had been « a thorn in the relationship of our two provinces for too long » and promised the interprovincial agreement would end the cross-border construction wars.

Mr. McNamara said he should never have been charged in August 2005 because he was helping his friend, Dan Cooper, and not operating a business. He said the Régie du bâtiment du Québec, which regulates the province’s construction industry, threatened to charge Mr. Cooper for allowing an unlicensed tradesman to work on his house.

« I wrote the Quebec government saying it wasn’t their business to interfere in the personal affairs between Dan and myself, » Mr. McNamara said.
« The notice to appear in court did not arrive at my house because it got lost in the mail or was sent to the wrong address, so I did not appear in court. »
Mr. McNamara was on vacation in December 2006 when the case came to court; he was found guilty in absentia.

« Last year, I got a notice from a collection agency saying I owed them $1,000. I told them what I thought of the process and they sent the matter back to Quebec City. » Mr. McNamara said he won’t pay the fine because a second trial has been set for March when he will be on vacation in Nicaragua.

Marjolaine Veillette, a spokeswoman for the Régie du bâtiment, said an Ontario contractor repairing a friend’s house in Quebec still requires a licence, which costs $616. Contractors face fines of $700 to $1,400 if they are caught working without a licence to prove their competence.
Contractors must prove they have been registered with Ontario’s new home warranty program for at least three years, have more than five years of experience and have been registered with the Ontario government for at least five years.

Individual construction workers can pay the Commission de la construction du Québec $10 to have their competency certificates from Ontario registered in Quebec.

Commission spokesman André Martin said Quebec has registered more than 1,600 out-of-province construction workers since 2006. © The Ottawa Citizen 2008